| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Aberdeen Wings | NAHL | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.1981 | 0.2096 | 0.5250 | 0.5556 |
| 2017-18 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 51 | 17 | 30 | 47 | 0.922 | 0.5665 | 0.5538 | 2.7152 | 2.6545 |
| 2018-19 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 59 | 18 | 35 | 53 | 0.898 | 0.5522 | 0.5114 | 2.6466 | 2.4508 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 38 | 19 | 31 | 50 | 1.316 |
| 2020-21 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 28 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 0.893 |
| 2020-21 | Minnesota State | D1 | WCHA | SO | 28 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 0.893 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 35 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 0.771 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota State | D1 | WCHA | FR | 35 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 0.771 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.