IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Nemgar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 14 24 38 0.655 0.2433 0.2364 0.6937 0.6739
2008-09 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 17 21 38 0.655 0.2433 0.2243 0.6937 0.6395
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 6 0 2 2 0.333
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 11 0 3 3 0.273
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 — FR 15 1 7 8 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2009-10 · St. Norbert
+172.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15288
Forward overall
#664
Forward born in 1988
#1123
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Ganz
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Singer
Wentworth · 2002-03
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Froese
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.