IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Nemgar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 14 24 38 0.655 0.2407 0.2338 0.6916 0.6719
2008-09 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 17 21 38 0.655 0.2407 0.2219 0.6916 0.6376
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 6 0 2 2 0.333
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 11 0 3 3 0.273
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 15 1 7 8 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2009-10 · St. Norbert
+174.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19814
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 1988
#1281
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexander Babich
Trine · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Remy Parker
Utica · 2018-19
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Singer
Wentworth · 2002-03
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.