Bobby Trivigno Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-19 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2017-18	Waterloo Black Hawks	USHL	58	16	27	43	0.741	0.4374	0.4331	2.1843	2.1629
2024-25	Brynäs IF	SHL	49	17	14	31	0.633	1.5817	1.6479	—	—
2025-26	Brynäs IF	SHL	50	8	17	25	0.500	1.2500	1.2500	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2021-22	UMass	D1	HockeyEast	—	37	20	29	49	1.324
2021-22	UMass Lowell	D1	HockeyEast	—	37	20	29	49	1.324
2020-21	UMass	D1	HockeyEast	JR	29	11	23	34	1.172
2019-20	UMass	D1	HockeyEast	SO	34	9	11	20	0.588
2018-19	UMass	D1	HockeyEast	FR	39	13	15	28	0.718

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.37

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.72

2018-19 · UMass

+93.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler

UMass Boston · 2015-16

1.125 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2017-18

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2022-23

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.