← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan George Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-20 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Selber Wölfe · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 50 8 24 32 0.640 0.2536 0.2768 0.6719 0.7334
2008-09 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 58 27 40 67 1.155 0.4577 0.4769 1.2128 1.2636
2018-19 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 49 14 28 42 0.857 0.3698 0.3393
2019-20 Lausitzer Füchse DEL2 52 30 29 59 1.135 0.4895 0.4895
2020-21 EHC Freiburg DEL2 45 15 17 32 0.711 0.3068 0.3068
2021-22 EHC Freiburg DEL2 26 11 22 33 1.269 0.5475 0.4690
2024-25 Selber Wölfe DEL2 17 1 4 5 0.294 0.1269 0.0813
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Bemidji State D1 SR 36 9 10 19 0.528
2011-12 Bemidji State D1 JR 38 19 12 31 0.816
2010-11 Bemidji State D1 SO 38 17 19 36 0.947
2009-10 Bemidji State D1 FR 36 13 21 34 0.944
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.94
2009-10 · Bemidji State
+178.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16768
Forward overall
#661
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.