IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaiah Bennis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-12-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 46 3 6 9 0.196 0.0727 0.0733 0.2072 0.2088
2008-09 — NAHL 53 17 12 29 0.547 0.2032 0.1947 0.5794 0.5552
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SR 25 11 8 19 0.760
2011-12 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — JR 21 3 2 5 0.238
2010-11 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SO 21 4 5 9 0.429
2009-10 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — FR 27 11 5 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+373.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27782
Forward overall
#1119
Forward born in 1988
#3221
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Scurfield
Lawrence · 2008-09
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Ross
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Gazich
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.