← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philippe Lapointe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 59 7 19 26 0.441 0.2600 0.2719 1.3224 1.3830
2018-19 — USHL 60 11 28 39 0.650 0.3834 0.3812 1.9505 1.9392
2019-20 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 36 20 35 55 1.528 0.5887 0.5887 2.2220 2.2220
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen GR 34 6 6 12 0.353
2023-24 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 39 1 6 7 0.179
2022-23 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 24 2 3 5 0.208
2021-22 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 11 3 1 4 0.364
2020-21 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2020-21 · Michigan
-50.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

100%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7505
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.