IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Voigt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-04-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 53 8 5 13 0.245 0.0911 0.0943 0.2597 0.2688
2010-11 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 54 17 19 36 0.667 0.2475 0.2435 0.7059 0.6946
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 26 7 11 18 0.692
2013-14 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 42 6 5 11 0.262
2012-13 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 16 5 4 9 0.562
2011-12 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 25 10 14 24 0.960
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2011-12 · Tufts
+510.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22429
Forward overall
#873
Forward born in 1991
#2304
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Mueller
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2009-10
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.