IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Graves Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Motor City Metal Jackets NAHL 46 1 6 7 0.152 0.0559 0.0593 0.1606 0.1704
2010-11 Motor City Metal Jackets NAHL 56 26 18 44 0.786 0.2887 0.2915 0.8293 0.8375
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 56 27 32 59 1.054 0.3871 0.3718 1.1121 1.0682
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 13 3 3 6 0.462
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 29 3 8 11 0.379
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 15 2 10 12 0.800
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 12 1 1 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2012-13 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-42.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15404
Forward overall
#599
Forward born in 1991
#757
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Miller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Lewis
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.478 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Russell Anderson
Utica · 2007-08
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.