IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam York Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-05 Country: USA
2019 · Round 1, Pick #14  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — NTDP-U18 59 8 30 38 0.644 0.4788 0.4832 2.4034 2.4255
2018-19 — NTDP-U18 63 14 51 65 1.032 0.7669 0.7348 3.8497 3.6886
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 24 4 16 20 0.833
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 30 5 11 16 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.65
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2019-20 · Michigan
-18.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 27 comparables)

74%
NCAA D1
7%
NCAA D2/D3
19%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.