IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Bohlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 50 2 11 13 0.260 0.1534 0.1600 0.7809 0.8146
2018-19 — USHL 50 2 6 8 0.160 0.0944 0.0936 0.4805 0.4765
2019-20 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 48 16 9 25 0.521 0.1913 0.1913 0.5497 0.5497
2020-21 — NAHL 55 8 20 28 0.509 0.1870 0.1870 0.5374 0.5374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Army D1 AHA SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Army D1 AHA JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Army D1 AHA SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Army D1 AHA FR 16 2 0 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2021-22 · Army
+21.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31240
Forward overall
#1574
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Shaheen
Endicott · 2016-17
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eddie Paulissian
Aurora · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Toby Sengvongxay
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.