IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Kovar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 28 0 6 6 0.214 0.0787 0.0843 0.2262 0.2424
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 40 2 6 8 0.200 0.0735 0.0751 0.2111 0.2158
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 50 3 9 12 0.240 0.0882 0.0857 0.2533 0.2462
2013-14 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 54 6 21 27 0.500 0.1837 0.1694 0.5278 0.4866
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 18 2 1 3 0.167
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11788
Defenseman overall
#1388
Defenseman born in 1993
#4044
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Benkovitz
Arcadia · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Norkevicus
Chatham · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Vella
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.