IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Kovar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 28 0 6 6 0.214 0.0796 0.0853 0.2269 0.2431
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 40 2 6 8 0.200 0.0743 0.0760 0.2118 0.2165
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 50 3 9 12 0.240 0.0891 0.0866 0.2541 0.2470
2013-14 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 54 6 21 27 0.500 0.1857 0.1712 0.5294 0.4881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 18 2 1 3 0.167
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8852
Defenseman overall
#1237
Defenseman born in 1993
#3833
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Vella
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Patrick
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.