IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Annunziato Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Hitmen NAHL 49 12 17 29 0.592 0.2103 0.2042 0.6242 0.6061
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 24 6 1 7 0.292
2015-16 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 18 0 2 2 0.111
2014-15 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 21 1 5 6 0.286
2013-14 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 25 5 8 13 0.520
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2013-14 · Lake Forest
+197.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23301
Forward overall
#859
Forward born in 1992
#1707
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marc Harrie
Concordia · 2007-08
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Kishko
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dean Balsamo
Adrian · 2015-16
0.688 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.