IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Pizzey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Michigan Warriors NAHL 29 4 7 11 0.379 0.1408 0.1563 0.4016 0.4459
2012-13 Michigan Warriors NAHL 44 5 7 12 0.273 0.1013 0.1074 0.2887 0.3061
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 22 19 41 0.976 0.2932 0.2866 0.8041 0.7860
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 28 8 5 13 0.464
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2016-17 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 26 3 11 14 0.538
2015-16 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 25 3 7 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2015-16 · Nazareth
+117.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20537
Forward overall
#823
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Nelson
Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.