IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Stefan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 47 1 7 8 0.170 0.0625 0.0646 0.1796 0.1855
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 43 5 21 26 0.605 0.2222 0.2184 0.6383 0.6273
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 51 7 10 17 0.333 0.1225 0.1142 0.3518 0.3281
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC SR 13 0 6 6 0.462
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC JR 27 8 11 19 0.704
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC SO 28 1 9 10 0.357
2014-15 Utica D3 UCHC FR 24 1 6 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2014-15 · Utica
+98.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10402
Defenseman overall
#1275
Defenseman born in 1993
#3656
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Martiniello
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Hennessy
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.