IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jérémie Bucheler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-03-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Chicago Steel USHL 51 1 5 6 0.118 0.0694 0.0729 0.3529 0.3706
2018-19 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 8 37 45 0.833 0.3211 0.3268 1.2120 1.2335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 33 6 12 18 0.545
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 32 1 9 10 0.312
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 35 1 10 11 0.314
2020-21 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 14 1 1 2 0.143
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 29 1 4 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2019-20 · Northeastern
-18.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6273
Defenseman overall
#1312
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bayley Marshall
Aurora · 2015-16
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2022-23
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.