IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Adams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 52 12 13 25 0.481 0.1871 0.1930 0.7012 0.7235
2011-12 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 31 8 13 21 0.677 0.2636 0.2575 0.9879 0.9650
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 28 16 19 35 1.250 0.4641 0.4382 1.3235 1.2496
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 23 2 8 10 0.435
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 25 7 3 10 0.400
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 30 10 6 16 0.533
2012-13 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8133
Forward overall
#347
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2017-18
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.