IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry Berger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Janesville Jets NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Elliot Lake Bobcats NOJHL 40 18 18 36 0.900 0.1517 0.1542 0.3740 0.3801
2013-14 Neepawa Titans MJHL 57 6 10 16 0.281 0.0794 0.0773 0.1769 0.1722
2014-15 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 30 13 14 27 0.900 0.1517 0.1382 0.3740 0.3407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Northland D3 — SO 8 0 1 1 0.125
2015-16 Northland D3 — FR 17 5 0 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Northland
+202.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40526
Forward overall
#1695
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Beliveau
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marco Iozzo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bochert
Morrisville · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.