IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bochert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 23 3 4 7 0.304 0.1130 0.1101 0.3222 0.3138
2015-16 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 42 22 26 48 1.143 0.1370 0.1270 0.2624 0.2433
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 23 4 6 10 0.435
2018-19 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2017-18 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 25 5 6 11 0.440
2016-17 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 20 2 4 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · Morrisville
+191.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32032
Forward overall
#1327
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Conley
Nichols · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabe Randel
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Schwindt
Elmira · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.