IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bob Kinne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 39 6 2 8 0.205 0.1306 0.1244 0.6146 0.5854
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 58 9 19 28 0.483 0.1793 0.1682 0.5112 0.4795
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Mary's D3 — SR 26 14 10 24 0.923
2015-16 Saint Mary's D3 — JR 25 9 18 27 1.080
2014-15 Saint Mary's D3 — SO 17 9 13 22 1.294
2013-14 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 26 1 2 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2013-14 · Bemidji State
-10.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26122
Forward overall
#1140
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Mecrones
New England · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casper Dyrssen
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Beer
Morrisville · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.