IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Beer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Estevan Bruins SJHL 52 14 5 19 0.365 0.0936 0.0923 0.2754 0.2715
2010-11 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 25 6 20 26 1.040 0.1737 0.1611 0.4330 0.4016
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 19 7 9 16 0.842
2013-14 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 16 7 5 12 0.750
2012-13 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 23 1 3 4 0.174
2011-12 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 24 4 7 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2011-12 · SUNY Morrisville
+301.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29819
Forward overall
#1091
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Husted
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Kontny
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.