IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor O'Neil Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 49 21 22 43 0.878 0.3259 0.3394 0.9292 0.9677
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 47 30 46 76 1.617 0.4856 0.4656 1.3319 1.2770
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 31 4 5 9 0.290
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 27 1 5 6 0.222
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 4 1 1 2 0.500
2015-16 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 37 6 4 10 0.270
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2015-16 · Vermont
-23.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4696
Forward overall
#181
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Williams
Curry · 2007-08
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Audette
Becker · 2018-19
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Nesper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.