IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Repensky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-11-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 37 6 21 27 0.730 0.2709 0.2744 0.7726 0.7826
2013-14 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 59 12 38 50 0.848 0.3147 0.3030 0.8973 0.8639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Yale D1 ECAC SO 13 1 3 4 0.308
2014-15 Yale D1 ECAC FR 28 3 11 14 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2014-15 · Yale
+81.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1480
Defenseman overall
#388
Defenseman born in 1993
#507
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chance Gorman
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Nowakowski
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.