IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

AJ Marcinek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 51 12 9 21 0.412 0.1513 0.1588 0.4347 0.4563
2013-14 Michigan Warriors NAHL 55 10 14 24 0.436 0.1603 0.1602 0.4606 0.4604
2014-15 Michigan Warriors NAHL 56 12 14 26 0.464 0.1706 0.1616 0.4901 0.4642
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE — 21 3 6 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2015-16 · Endicott
+210.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31828
Forward overall
#1224
Forward born in 1994
#2992
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wyatt Nielsen
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Mead
Becker · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Lawson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.