IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eriks Zohovs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-26 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 29 19 14 33 1.138 0.2629 0.2835 0.5568 0.6005
2016-17 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 32 15 24 39 1.219 0.4478 0.4538 1.2864 1.3037
2017-18 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.1770 0.1651 0.9010 0.8405
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 24 3 3 6 0.250
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 27 1 6 7 0.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2019-20 · Alaska Fairbanks
+8.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13558
Forward overall
#603
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Mikulan
Aurora · 2011-12
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy York
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dayne Bihn
Neumann · 2003-04
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.