IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lonnie Clary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 51 6 11 17 0.333 0.1225 0.1293 0.3518 0.3713
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 55 13 22 35 0.636 0.2338 0.2350 0.6717 0.6752
2014-15 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 54 8 15 23 0.426 0.1565 0.1491 0.4495 0.4283
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Marian D1 NCHA SR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA — 24 0 2 2 0.083
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 0 3 3 0.115
2015-16 RPI D1 ECAC — 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#29965
Forward overall
#1154
Forward born in 1994
#2694
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Higgins
Becker · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eitan Geralnik
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Love
New England College · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.