IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corey Hoffman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 32 4 9 13 0.406 0.1492 0.1692 0.4287 0.4861
2013-14 New York Bobcats EHL 11 6 5 11 1.000 0.2310 0.2515 0.4893 0.5327
2014-15 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 34 10 22 32 0.941 0.3458 0.3567 0.9934 1.0246
2015-16 — BCHL 56 12 27 39 0.696 0.2683 0.2611 1.0135 0.9862
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#14536
Forward overall
#576
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Micale
Buffalo State · 2022-23
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Seltenreich
University of New England · 2015-16
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.