IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Mathias Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fresno Monsters NAHL 27 3 2 5 0.185 0.0658 0.0675 0.1953 0.2004
2013-14 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 34 3 6 9 0.265 0.0940 0.0917 0.2792 0.2725
2014-15 — NAHL 55 13 16 29 0.527 0.1873 0.1730 0.5562 0.5137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Marian D1 NCHA SR 28 2 4 6 0.214
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA SR 28 2 4 6 0.214
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA JR 29 2 6 8 0.276
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA SO 27 3 7 10 0.370
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA FR 25 4 5 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2015-16 · Marian
+199.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37666
Forward overall
#1479
Forward born in 1994
#3851
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Rust
Adrian · 2013-14
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Gooch
Neumann · 2003-04
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Cowlthorp
Norwich · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.