IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas McDiarmid Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 30 8 6 14 0.467 0.1073 0.1078 0.1479 0.1486
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0475 0.0464 0.1260 0.1232
2013-14 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 55 1 7 8 0.145 0.0576 0.0534 0.1528 0.1417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 23 3 1 4 0.174
2016-17 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2015-16 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 14 1 0 1 0.071
2014-15 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#49799
Forward overall
#1872
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Kwak
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick LeSage
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.