IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Kaszupski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0560 0.1508 0.1610
2013-14 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 46 6 4 10 0.217 0.0799 0.0813 0.2295 0.2335
2014-15 — NAHL 51 7 13 20 0.392 0.1441 0.1390 0.4140 0.3995
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE — 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2015-16 · Endicott
+312.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40908
Forward overall
#1637
Forward born in 1994
#4375
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Hill
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Blanchet
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Perrone
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.