IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Enciso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 42 13 20 33 0.786 0.0869 0.0918 0.2489 0.2629
2013-14 — NAHL 54 12 16 28 0.518 0.1842 0.1706 0.5444 0.5041
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SR 18 0 3 3 0.167
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 24 7 5 12 0.500
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 16 2 2 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+109.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28860
Forward overall
#981
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Reinholz
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Perichak
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Lappin
Suffolk · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.