IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Lindberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — NAHL 34 1 10 11 0.324 0.1189 0.1153 0.3415 0.3313
2014-15 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 19 1 0 1 0.053 0.0193 0.0177 0.0555 0.0509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 11 0 3 3 0.273
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2016-17 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 16 1 3 4 0.250
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 11 0 5 5 0.455
2015-16 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 19 0 5 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2015-16 · Gustavus Adolphus
+747.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20516
Defenseman overall
#2149
Defenseman born in 1994
#5909
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Koshiol
Keene State · 2023-24
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Greniuk
Hamline · 2023-24
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Simmons
SUNY Brockport · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.