IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Fuchs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minot Minotauros NAHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1837 0.1928 0.5278 0.5540
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 46 4 9 13 0.283 0.1038 0.1035 0.2983 0.2975
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 13 0 2 2 0.154 0.0565 0.0538 0.1623 0.1547
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 2 11 13 0.481
2019-20 Concordia (MN) D1 — SR 27 2 11 13 0.481
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 24 2 10 12 0.500
2018-19 Concordia (MN) D1 — JR 24 2 10 12 0.500
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 2 10 12 0.462
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 24 4 7 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · Concordia
+626.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38762
Forward overall
#1606
Forward born in 1995
#4067
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Samodral
Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cale Coor
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
John Lennartson
Augsburg · 2007-08
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.