IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 19 0 1 1 0.053 0.0187 0.0190 0.0552 0.0560
2014-15 Nepean Raiders CCHL 57 16 13 29 0.509 0.1104 0.1046 0.3939 0.3732
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 21 0 2 2 0.095
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 18 3 1 4 0.222
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 21 3 0 3 0.143
2015-16 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 24 1 2 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2015-16 · Connecticut College
+107.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47977
Forward overall
#1971
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Daniels
Hobart · 2021-22
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Rasberg
New England · 2015-16
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.