IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Japchen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-12-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Omaha Lancers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Madison Capitols USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Brooks Bandits AJHL 36 2 9 11 0.306 0.1014 0.1014 0.2832 0.2832
2020-21 Houston Bulls NAHL 55 13 13 26 0.473 0.1873 0.1873 0.4963 0.4963
2021-22 Houston Bulls NAHL 51 11 16 27 0.529 0.2097 0.2043 0.5558 0.5415
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 32 1 1 2 0.062
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 25 1 6 7 0.280
2023-24 Stonehill D1 AHA — 30 3 11 14 0.467
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC — 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8147
Defenseman overall
#1681
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Decker
Norwich · 2002-03
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Casale
Salem State · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
William Pelletier
Norwich · 2012-13
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.