IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Cagnoni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Bay State Breakers USPHL-Premier-Classic 12 1 1 2 0.167 0.0468 0.0476 0.1371 0.1393
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 31 4 8 12 0.387 0.1087 0.1051 0.3183 0.3079
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 11 2 1 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Augsburg
+287.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50516
Forward overall
#2210
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eddie Gustin
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.