IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Cline Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 51 23 22 45 0.882 0.3242 0.3244 0.9314 0.9319
2015-16 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 26 15 17 32 1.231 0.4522 0.4324 1.2991 1.2422
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SR 36 8 11 19 0.528
2018-19 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 33 6 5 11 0.333
2017-18 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 27 8 4 12 0.444
2016-17 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 35 4 10 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · Alaska Fairbanks
+20.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7713
Forward overall
#366
Forward born in 1995
#118
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Savel
Utica · 2017-18
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Ratcliffe
Westfield State · 2017-18
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.