IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Souto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 59 3 15 18 0.305 0.1121 0.1139 0.3220 0.3272
2015-16 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 58 5 12 17 0.293 0.1077 0.1047 0.3094 0.3007
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC GR 11 1 5 6 0.545
2020-21 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 5 3 1 4 0.800
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 20 4 5 9 0.450
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 16 4 2 6 0.375
2016-17 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 21 4 13 17 0.809
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2016-17 · Saint John's
+772.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42678
Forward overall
#1820
Forward born in 1995
#4653
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Teddy Puccini
Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Padgitt
New England College · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Trine · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.