IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Giles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-14 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Eisbären Regensburg · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 50 1 5 6 0.120 0.0441 0.0457 0.1268 0.1313
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 57 2 16 18 0.316 0.1160 0.1150 0.3338 0.3308
2024-25 Eisbären Regensburg DEL2 52 4 4 8 0.154 0.2060 0.1911 0.2759 0.2559
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 37 1 5 6 0.162
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 38 2 7 9 0.237
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 34 0 6 6 0.176
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 22 0 4 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2016-17 · Robert Morris
+120.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20428
Defenseman overall
#2435
Defenseman born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Dante Hahn
Concordia · 2023-24
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Baptista
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Moore
Elmira · 2012-13
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.