IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 44 10 14 24 0.545 0.2224 0.2445 — —
2018-19 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 48 10 26 36 0.750 0.2756 0.2888 — —
2019-20 — NAHL 51 15 15 30 0.588 0.2161 0.2161 0.6208 0.6208
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 56 15 27 42 0.750 0.2756 0.2756 0.7916 0.7916
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 27 9 7 16 0.593
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 29 11 4 15 0.517
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 25 7 7 14 0.560
2021-22 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 29 8 10 18 0.621
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2021-22 · St. Olaf
+167.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17890
Forward overall
#803
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.