← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Alden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 13 1 2 3 0.231 0.0889 0.0976 0.3363 0.3694
2016-17 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 16 2 7 9 0.562 0.1998 0.2114 0.5906 0.6250
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 60 10 37 47 0.783 0.2782 0.2806 0.8224 0.8296
2018-19 BCHL 28 3 3 6 0.214 0.0826 0.0781 0.3123 0.2952
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC 27 7 14 21 0.778
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC 25 2 12 14 0.560
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 18 2 9 11 0.611
2019-20 Plattsburgh D1 FR 20 2 4 6 0.300
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 20 2 4 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2019-20 · Plattsburgh
+120.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36318
Forward overall
#1858
Forward born in 1998
#3665
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.