IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Coomes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coquitlam Express BCHL 18 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 56 25 40 65 1.161 0.4264 0.4328 1.2251 1.2436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2018-19 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 30 2 7 9 0.300
2017-18 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 29 3 8 11 0.379
2016-17 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 20 2 4 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · Merrimack
-20.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20672
Forward overall
#822
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Robbie Baillargeon
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Olson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Gambardella
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Iafallo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chandler Madry
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicolas Pigeon
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.