IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Molinaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 North York Rangers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 — OJHL 44 4 11 15 0.341 0.0836 0.0883 0.2346 0.2477
2014-15 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 53 25 42 67 1.264 0.3099 0.3112 0.8701 0.8738
2015-16 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 56 16 29 45 0.804 0.2952 0.2902 0.8493 0.8349
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 — SR 24 4 10 14 0.583
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 24 4 10 14 0.583
2018-19 Oswego D1 — JR 28 15 8 23 0.821
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 28 15 8 23 0.821
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 25 6 13 19 0.760
2016-17 Niagara D1 AHA FR 30 0 3 3 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · Niagara
-60.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17272
Forward overall
#670
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Rook
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sy Nutkevitch
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2016-17
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.