IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Jeanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Portage Terriers MJHL 59 21 19 40 0.678 0.1305 0.1502 0.4275 0.4919
2014-15 Portage Terriers MJHL 56 23 31 54 0.964 0.1856 0.2039 0.6081 0.6681
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 60 10 21 31 0.517 0.1898 0.2008 0.5454 0.5771
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 52 17 25 42 0.808 0.2967 0.2978 0.8525 0.8557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 17 2 3 5 0.294
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 36 2 5 7 0.194
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 36 4 7 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · Colgate
+37.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18728
Forward overall
#831
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Padgeon
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Heintz
Adrian · 2017-18
1.179 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Fink
Concordia · 2011-12
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.