IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marshall Bowery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 53 6 17 23 0.434 0.1595 0.1621 0.4581 0.4657
2016-17 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 57 18 17 35 0.614 0.2256 0.2171 0.6481 0.6236
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Air Force D1 AHA SR 14 0 3 3 0.214
2019-20 Air Force D1 AHA JR 31 10 6 16 0.516
2018-19 Air Force D1 AHA SO 30 2 2 4 0.133
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA FR 30 8 1 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2017-18 · Air Force
+79.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25802
Forward overall
#1060
Forward born in 1996
#2104
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Clayton Boyd
Neumann · 2016-17
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Drevitch
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Steuck
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.