IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Clayton Boyd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0133 0.0141 0.0255 0.0270
2015-16 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 39 8 18 26 0.667 0.0799 0.0810 0.1531 0.1552
2016-17 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 43 19 39 58 1.349 0.1617 0.1546 0.3097 0.2961
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC SR 9 3 1 4 0.444
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC JR 26 4 7 11 0.423
2018-19 Neumann D3 MAC SO 25 4 7 11 0.440
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC FR 26 2 10 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2017-18 · Neumann
+330.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31873
Forward overall
#1397
Forward born in 1996
#132
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robb Haider
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly O'Brien
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Ramoundos
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.