IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Naumovski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Omaha Lancers USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 59 16 43 59 1.000 0.3674 0.3684 1.0569 1.0597
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA — 34 8 17 25 0.735
2022-23 Niagara D1 AHA SR 40 9 17 26 0.650
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA JR 36 7 16 23 0.639
2020-21 Niagara D1 AHA SO 22 3 10 13 0.591
2019-20 Niagara D1 AHA FR 34 4 15 19 0.559
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2019-20 · Niagara
+68.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20353
Forward overall
#1013
Forward born in 1999
#1341
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brody Simko
Trine · 2023-24
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Ratcliffe
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.