← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Dennis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 15 1 1 2 0.133 0.0474 0.0488 0.1406 0.1447
2017-18 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 9 7 16 0.640
2021-22 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SR 25 9 7 16 0.640
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 19 4 12 16 0.842
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D1 NCHA JR 19 4 12 16 0.842
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 19 4 12 16 0.842
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D1 NCHA SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 0 10 10 0.400
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D1 NCHA FR 25 0 10 10 0.400
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 0 10 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2018-19 · Concordia
+767.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23777
Defenseman overall
#2908
Defenseman born in 1997
#6362
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2004-05
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2022-23
0.452 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.