← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reed Robinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0334 0.0361 0.0959 0.1038
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 56 12 20 32 0.571 0.2099 0.2157 0.6031 0.6199
2017-18 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 58 22 20 42 0.724 0.2660 0.2603 0.7643 0.7478
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Niagara D1 AHA JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Niagara D1 AHA SO 24 2 0 2 0.083
2018-19 Niagara D1 AHA FR 32 8 7 15 0.469
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2018-19 · Niagara
+125.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26303
Forward overall
#1287
Forward born in 1998
#2168
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
3.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.