← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frankie Trazzera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 45 2 2 4 0.089 0.0330 0.0346 0.0941 0.0986
2017-18 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 58 4 6 10 0.172 0.0640 0.0639 0.1825 0.1823
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 58 8 19 27 0.466 0.1728 0.1649 0.4929 0.4702
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA SR 28 6 12 18 0.643
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA JR 26 6 12 18 0.692
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SO 14 2 5 7 0.500
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA FR 27 4 9 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Trine
+351.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36625
Forward overall
#1645
Forward born in 1998
#4652
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.