← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frankie Trazzera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 45 2 2 4 0.089 0.0327 0.0343 0.0938 0.0983
2017-18 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 58 4 6 10 0.172 0.0633 0.0632 0.1820 0.1818
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 58 8 19 27 0.466 0.1710 0.1631 0.4913 0.4687
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA SR 28 6 12 18 0.643
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA JR 26 6 12 18 0.692
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SO 14 2 5 7 0.500
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA FR 27 4 9 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Trine
+356.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43604
Forward overall
#2315
Forward born in 1998
#4794
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.