← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Tucker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Milton Menace OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1406 0.3443 0.3948
2016-17 North York Rangers OJHL 13 0 3 3 0.231 0.0566 0.0624 0.1589 0.1751
2017-18 North York Rangers OJHL 52 17 33 50 0.962 0.2357 0.2484 0.6620 0.6977
2018-19 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 13 30 43 0.694 0.4091 0.4068 2.0829 2.0711
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 48 18 25 43 0.896 0.5284 0.5284 2.6904 2.6904
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 48 10 33 43 0.896 0.5284 0.5284 2.6904 2.6904
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 34 3 5 8 0.235
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC 34 4 10 14 0.412
2022-23 Michigan State D1 BigTen 31 6 4 10 0.323
2021-22 Michigan State D1 BigTen 36 2 22 24 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2021-22 · Michigan State
+126.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

98%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5309
Forward overall
#218
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.